It’s also bad news the way things went for users, they are never considered and this is a trend we’re seeing more and more, the simple fact that this happened again is indeed very bad news.
The EOL is not bad news for me personally, but as a member of the CGI community it certainly is, It was indeed bad news when Max stopped having unlimited nodes for a production ready renderer. Personally I don’t use MR since college, still, less players in the field.
#Nvidia mental ray maya 2017 update#
The biggest problem I see with this EOL is what should we do with our legacy work, I this case we are safe, we have our max and Maya 2017 licenses and that’s it, we can recover our work and translate to Blender, and we won’t go further with Autodesk in any sense, but others that have legacy work and are in rental… they won’t be able to recover anything in a few time… and that is not good, and yes, there are time when you have to recover a 5 year old project to update it, and having to translate it to a different engine, or not being able to recover all the materials is a big problem. I think you are focusing too much in the industry you think is the bigger one, and in the quality you like, but the reality is that there are many studios with many different pipelines with different qualities. And also… why should those studios reasonably good VFX? Studios with a visually high quality work should be ignored? They pay the same as any other studio, they have no discount because their job is not the prettiest one.
0 kommentar(er)
